|
|||||||
| Hanafi Fiqh Discuss fiqh matters; ask and answer questions on Hanafi fiqh |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 513
|
Quote:
__________________
'Arsh`ay 'haq hay masnad`ay rif'at Rasoolullah ki - Daikhni hay 'hashr main 'izzat Rasoolullah ki Woh jahannam main gaya jo un say mustaghni hoa - Hay Khaleelullah ko 'haajat Rasoolullah ki |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 207
|
@Harun
You need help |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||||||||||
|
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,310
|
how come you decide to become an internet mufti on some matters and not on which you cannot answer?
answers to all your confusion can be found in MFM. i can understand your condescension and your refusal to accept the words of an anonymous nobody. but it is more of a collection of quotes from great ulama respected worldwide. all those quotes are referenced - anybody can look them up. now, if my quotes are out of context, go ahead and critique them. show the proper context. if these are mistranslated, correct those passages. why can't you read MFM, at least once, even if it is with disdain? after all, you are the people (as it appears from your postings and minhaji defence) who want to have an understanding with yahud/nasara by going to them and calling them. is it that difficult to look into a book written by a muslim? or are you afraid that the book will cast a spell on you? ---- your questions are a product of qiyas-e-fasid. let us forget our disagreement for a moment, and talk as two students (as you too claim to be a student). aren't these questions loaded ones? i mean, if you are a serious, will you peek in a book, find a hadith or event and run away with your own qiyas? is there a method or not to follow? do you accept usul or not? see it is difficult to talk to a person who takes any position that suits him. in spite of our anonymous handles, all of us declare of positions upfront. why can't you do that? are you afraid of stating your true belief? i understand that you are not a mufti and a totally-helpless-blank student, but at least you may know the following basics: 1. do you believe in abrogation? (nasikh-mansukh) 2. if there are two hadith that (apparently) contradict - one that was said in previous years of hijrah and one that is from later years of hijrah, which one do you think might be the abrogator? 3. sayyiduna `umar was a ruler. can any of his actions - raDiyallahu `anhu - be considered as a model for us? did he understand these issues better or prof.tahir knows better? 4. can the opinions of imam a'azam, imam abu yusuf and imam muhammad be considered authority? -------- in principle, i should answer your questions only when you have declared your persuasion. who knows you may turn out to be an anti-hadith Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
-------------------------------------------------------- see, in spite of those loaded questions, i have given you straight answers. now you tell me, Quote:
Quote:
does any book of hadith or fiqh include rulings on ahl al-kitab? if so, which book do you trust? Quote:
ahl al-kitab are allowed to drink wine and eat pork in muslim countries; but is it permissible for a muslim to purchase wine and pork, lay it on his table, invite christians and ask them to enjoy the wine and bacon (you have come to your own house, please do not hesitate) an islamic act? even if the host does not drink wine or eat pork himself? Quote:
are you implying that wahabis with mujassimah beliefs are kafir?
__________________
no signature is good signature |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Resident Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,347
|
yes harun is a jahil mutlaq:
harun i suggest you read the various tafasir of this verse: وَالَّذِينَ اتَّخَذُوا مَسْجِداً ضِرَاراً وَكُفْراً وَتَفْرِيقاً بَيْنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَإِرْصَادَاً لِمَنْ حَارَبَ اللَّهَ وَرَسُولَهُ مِنْ قَبْلُ وَلَيَحْلِفُنَّ إِنْ أَرَدْنَا إِلّا الْحُسْنَى وَاللَّهُ يَشْهَدُ إِنَّهُمْ لَكَاذِبُونَ and this one وَأَنَّ الْمَسَاجِدَ لِلَّهِ فَلا تَدْعُو مَعَ اللَّهِ أَحَداً
and these ones:فِي بُيُوتٍ أَذِنَ اللَّهُ أَنْ تُرْفَعَ وَيُذْكَرَ فِيهَا اسْمُهُ يُسَبِّحُ لَهُ فِيهَا بِالْغُدُوِّ وَالْآصَالِ ، رِجَالٌ لا تُلْهِيهِمْ تِجَارَةٌ وَلا بَيْعٌ عَنْ ذِكْرِ
اللَّهِ وَإِقَامِ الصَّلاةِ وَإِيتَاءِ الزَّكَاةِ يَخَافُونَ يَوْماً تَتَقَلَّبُ فِيهِ الْقُلُوبُ وَالْأَبْصَارُ ، لِيَجْزِيَهُمُ اللَّهُ أَحْسَنَ مَا عَمِلُوا وَيَزِيدَهُمْ مِنْ فَضْلِهِ وَاللَّهُ يَرْزُقُ مَنْ يَشَاءُ بِغَيْرِ حِسَابٍ and finally this one and the fuqahaa's extractions from it: يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا إِنَّمَا الْمُشْرِكُونَ نَجَسٌ فَلا يَقْرَبُوا الْمَسْجِدَ الْحَرَامَ بَعْدَ عَامِهِمْ هَذَا وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ عَيْلَةً فَسَوْفَ يُغْنِيكُمُ اللَّهُ
----------مِنْ فَضْلِهِ إِنْ شَاءَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ عَلِيمٌ حَكِيمٌ rather than making your jahil mutlaq qiyas on permission of dhimmis to worship in a muslim state over permission of kafirs to worship in a mosque ---------- speaking of bloody dhimmis, see the primary fiqh manuals of ALL 4 madhhabs of the ahlus sunnah and see what are the rulings on a person who has honored dhimmis by activities such as those done by padri and his jahil mutlaq crew (hint: all four madhhabs call it irtidad)
__________________
Think sheeple. Think, sheeple! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 207
|
yes harun is a jahil mutlaq
I think where he is heading with his defence of blatant kufr is more dangerous than jihalat!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,310
|
oh, i missed this one. apologies.
Quote:
--------------- now my question: Quote:
if suppose, a head of a muslim state announces that christians of my kingdom are allowed to bring their crosses in Muslim masjids, and chant that yisa alayhi's salam is the son of god (al-iyadhubillah); that by doing so, they have not gone anywhere - they have come to their own homes. and proclaims that all christians are believers alongside muslims and form a single ummah and christians should not be considered as disbelievers. will we issue a fatwa of kufr on him for not considering ahl-e-kitab as kafir or not?
__________________
no signature is good signature |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Resident Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,347
|
for those who can comprehend and whose eyes are not star studded, please do see the tafasir of the verses quoted in post # 14.
if the ummah's sheeple of our times were even as switched on as the Muslim CRIMINALS of Sayyidina Ghawth-e-A3zdham or Imam-e-A3zdham's times, just a cursory look at the tafasir of those verses would shred the padri to smithereens, along with his jahil mutlaq crew of fanboys and they (the criminals of their times) would have issued fatwas of kufr on his actions inviting christians to pray according to their traditions in Muslim mosques it is directly related to the topic. it is also a pitiful tragedy that a thousand plus years ago, our akabir have answered questions that are relevant even to our times, yet the star studded eyes and obscene levels of jahalah in our time can't even permit us to open their works and as much as read! this is the only reason people like the padri get away with what they can!
__________________
Think sheeple. Think, sheeple! Last edited by abu Hasan : 03-25-2012 at 05:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 52
|
Those you are attacking brother Harun, need to know what this verse means
![]() http://quran.com/3/159 and the tafsir .... may be this the issue here, condescending tone ? Everyone admits that Dr Tahir al Qadri has made mistakes but it looks here that some brothers want to make sure that Taher al Qadri becomes Murtad and Kafir instead of approaching Dr Taher and showing him his mistakes. FEDEX or UPS , can deliver your book to him. Easy to get his address, Wadood can help. I will also approach him and give him the book when i get a chance, but not to mock Dr Taher or make him look like some idiot. Rather, to help him, be in Islam and work for Ahlus Sunnah. Why do we always look for any opportunity to draw swords and make blood and property of our brethren halal ? Look for excuses. Last edited by khadim.awliya : 03-25-2012 at 06:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,310
|
Quote:
for shayTan? this dajjal is distorting verses and tearing up sahih hadith to fit his worldview. and shayTan whispers in your ears to close your eyes and act like a naked shayTan. --- Quote:
__________________
no signature is good signature Last edited by abu Hasan : 03-25-2012 at 06:30 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 52
|
I said Dr Taher made mistakes. But, I would not doubt the intentions of Taher al Qadri rather, I would say lack of knowledge or articulation. lack of use of proper words.
Why cannot you understand that shariah education is sub-standard in the subcontinent. People have hard time making a living and when there is no hope they become molvis and maulanas. why so much expectation from such people. Dr Taher is no different than any other normal molvi from subcontinent. Everyone knows here what I am speaking about. I am ready for anything you ask. Put the clear cut kufric statement of Dr Taher ul Qadri in the light of shariah. who can deny it ? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|